Advertisement

PAPER DIKES: A Billion Pesos of "Flood Control," and La Union Still Drowns


Luis and Maymay didn't expose a lack of projects. They exposed what the projects were actually for.

LA UNION (Aug. 8, 2026) — Tropical Depression Luis weakened into a low-pressure area right over the coastal waters of Balaoan, and Maymay formed just off Bacnotan and drove straight for the Ilocos–La Union coastlines. The rivers did what rivers do here. What they shouldn't have done is win — not in a province that, on paper, has been one of the country's most heavily funded flood-control showcases for three straight years.

THE FACT SHEET

The figure
What it means
1,735 families / 4,989 individuals
La Union residents affected by Luis + Maymay this week (provincial tally)
213 families
Still packed into evacuation centers as of this writing
P11.1 million
Agricultural damage from the two storms combined
P226.8 million
Four DPWH flood-control projects broken ground in La Union, January 2025
P1.35 billion
Flood-mitigation contracts awarded to Silverwolves Construction across La Union towns, 2023–2024
P28.9 million / P29 million
"Completed" flood structures in Sudipen and San Juan — both in the 1st District
P1.007 trillion
DPWH's 2025 national budget, the second-largest of any agency that year
P252 billion
Locally-funded flood control stripped from DPWH's 2026 budget after the scandal broke
P530.9 billion
What DPWH still got for 2026 — second-highest budget in the national government
P800 million
Ill-gotten flood-control assets actually returned to the treasury, out of P20 billion identified
Do the math. One contractor, one province, two years: P1.35 billion in flood mitigation. This week's reward for that spending: nearly five thousand people affected, hundreds still evacuated, and P11.1 million in crops destroyed. The water clearly never got the memo that it was supposed to be controlled.

Follow the wolf

The name keeps surfacing: Silverwolves Construction. DPWH's own contract records show the firm stacking flood-mitigation awards across La Union towns in 2023–2024, and Senate disclosures put the insertion-funded La Union haul even higher — nearly P1.6 billion.
Some of that money, investigators allege, paid for fiction. Two packages along the Bauang River basin, P89.7 million each, were flagged as a P179.4-million "ghost" project where inspectors found prop pipes — staging, not structure. The DPWH has since filed bid-rigging and graft cases against contractors and its own personnel, including cases naming Silverwolves.
And then there are the two showcase structures — P28.9 million in Sudipen, P29 million in San Juan — both "completed," both in the 1st District of House Deputy Speaker Paolo Ortega V. Ortega has publicly insisted there are no ghost or substandard flood projects in his district. Yet by public account, the newly created Independent Commission for Infrastructure has placed two flood-control packages associated with the congressman under scrutiny. Completed on paper, questioned in person — that gap is the entire story of Philippine infrastructure in one paragraph.

The P252-billion amputation

When the scandal exploded, President Marcos ordered P252 billion in locally-funded flood control scrapped from the 2026 budget proposal. Read carefully, that directive is a confession: the "locally-funded" line was the insertion pipeline — the channel through which congressional insertions bypassed screening and landed, wolf-like, in favored districts.
But study the implications and the cut looks less like reform and more like an amputation that hits the patient, not the disease:
  • It punishes flood-prone towns for the cartel's sins. Legitimate mitigation works die with the slush fund. This week's 1,735 affected families are the down payment on that decision.
  • The department survives intact. Even after the scandal, DPWH's 2026 budget stands at P530.9 billion — still the second-highest in government. What was cut was not the department's power, but the channel Congress controlled. The money machine didn't break; it just changed valves.
  • It manufactures "reform" without fixing procurement. Zeroing out a line item lets Malacañang claim cleanup while the same projects can simply re-enter the budget labeled "nationally funded." No open bidding reform, no completion audits, no engineer accountability — just a new ledger column.

A year of SONAs, a trickle of justice

In his July 2025 SONA, Marcos vowed to expose and prosecute the flood-control cartels — a speech that ignited the 2025–2026 anti-corruption protests over alleged irregularities approaching P1.9 trillion nationwide.
One year later, the fifth SONA's harvest is thin: P800 million in ill-gotten assets returned to the treasury out of P20 billion identified (roughly P25 billion if you count frozen assets, by the President's own alternate tally). The Ombudsman's probe tags former House Speaker Martin Romualdez as a "central figure" accused of receiving tens of billions in payoffs, and the DPWH seeks charges against Romualdez and 86 others. Charges "soon." Recoveries in dribs. Convictions of the big fish: none.
Meanwhile the master plan stalls and the storms keep arriving on schedule. Prosecuting the past is not the same as protecting the present.

The bottom line

Watch three things this budget season: whether the ICI's La Union findings turn into filings; whether the Ombudsman's "soon" arrives; and whether "locally-funded flood control" returns in the 2027 proposal wearing a new name. It will.
A flood-control project that only controls the flow of money is not infrastructure. It is a withdrawal slip. And from Balaoan to Bauang, La Union is still waiting for its deposit.

Sources & further reading: Provincial DRRM tally (Luis/Maymay); DPWH contract records; Rappler (Luis/Maymay tracks; P252B scrapping; one-year-after crackdown report); PhilStar (La Union "prop pipes" ghost project; DPWH 2026 budget); Inquirer (bid-rigging raps; SONA 2026 recoveries); GMA News & PIA (budget cut directives); Bilyonaryo (Silverwolves insertions); Manila Standard & Manila Bulletin (Ortega statements; ICI scrutiny); Wikipedia (flood-control scandal timeline).